![]() Particularly ironic considering the Japanese were the only ones who had officially adopted a "targeting surface combat vessels with submarines" doctrine - the biggest fish their subs caught, to my knowledge, was the already-limping Yorktown. ![]() ![]() But a significant chunk of the reason why they were added in the first place was because they WERE listening to their players, and more importantly, to prospective future players - just not to the players whose opinions align with your own.Īlso, while the braindead patriotard wording of the above post utterly disgusts me, yes - there were actually an astonishingly large number of Japanese warships sunk by submarine torpedoes, including battleships (Kongou sends her regards). ![]() Sure, the way Wargaming has chosen to implement them has caused a significant rift in the playerbase, and it probably could've been done a lot better. Hell, just yesterday there was somebody announcing they were uninstalling because their nation of choice DIDN'T have submarines yet. Originally posted by Totally Innocent Chatbot:They're in the game because there was significant demand for them. They're in the game because there was significant demand for them. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |